Investors in Bitcoin SV are advocating for a legal revival against Binance.

Investors in Bitcoin SV (BSV) have decided to renew their lawsuit against Binance following an earlier dismissal by the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal. A judge in the UK noted that BSV faced a significant potential growth loss of 73.27 times as a result of Binance’s decision to delist it. The legal dispute between BSV investors and Binance is intensifying once more. Following its rejection by the UK’s Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) in July, BSV Claims Limited is attempting to resume its appeal, as reported by Law230. The company is accusing Binance and other exchanges including Kraken and ShapeShift of negatively impacting BSV holders by removing the token from their platforms since 2019. The assertion is that the action resulted in massive losses—projected to reach £10 billion, which is roughly $13 billion. During the most recent court session on May 8, 2025, the judge delivered a surprising statement. He mentioned that the possible growth of BSV lost because of the delisting could reach up to 349,483 times its original value. Bitcoin SV continues to expand from the Philippines to Latin America. Although the legal proceedings are still active in UK courts, BSV is simultaneously growing its presence on the ground. On February 27, 2025, the token was officially launched on Coinstore, a global cryptocurrency exchange popular among users in the Philippines. This listing of BSV on Coinstore broadens its accessibility to both individual and institutional investors, as the exchange is recognized for its focus on regulatory compliance and low transaction costs—factors that appeal particularly to developing markets. Additionally, on April 28, 2025, BSV Blockchain revealed plans to expand into Latin America. The justification makes sense; the area is seen as having an immediate demand for technological innovations, such as blockchain, to tackle persistent economic and political issues. BSV’s foray into this market indicates that they are still active, even though they face ongoing legal challenges. Nonetheless, there is a vulnerability in their legal stance.