Stablecoin Debate Intensifies as Lawmakers Clash Over Consumer Earnings

Coinbase CEO Armstrong champions yield-bearing stablecoins as consumer-friendly alternatives to low-interest bank savings accounts. Senator Gillibrand warns stablecoin yields risk bank stability, sparking debate over financial fairness and consumer choice. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has publicly defended stablecoins that offer interest to users, framing them as beneficial for both consumers and the U.S. government. In a March 31 social media post, Armstrong argued that allowing individuals to earn returns on stablecoin holdings aligns with free-market principles, citing increased demand for Treasury bills as a potential upside. His remarks came amid legislative efforts to regulate stablecoins, including the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act, which aim to set standards for digital dollar-pegged tokens. Tomorrow’s House Financial Services Committee market up the STABLES Act is another historic moment for crypto. The bill reflects years of hard work to build a bipartisan consensus, and we urge members to vote yes. Along with Senate Banking’s passage of the bipartisan GENIUS Act,… pic.twitter.com/R6dZpVMV9Z — Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) April 1, 2025 The debate sharpened after Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a co-sponsor of the GENIUS Act, voiced concerns that interest-bearing stablecoins might undercut traditional banks. At a recent blockchain conference, Gillibrand questioned whether stablecoin issuers should offer yields, warning that diverting deposits from banks could limit their ability to fund mortgages or loans. Critics interpreted her stance as prioritizing banks over consumer choice. This week, @FinancialCmte will be marking up @RepBryanSteil’s STABLE Act to harness the promise of payment stablecoins. Proud to cosponsor this landmark legislation and advocate for its passage at @DigitalChamber’s blockchain summit. pic.twitter.com/TO2Gdv9trW — Congressman Troy Downing (@RepTroyDowning) April 1, 2025 Armstrong countered by highlighting the disparity between interest rates offered by banks and those achievable through stablecoins. He noted that while the Federal Reserve’s benchmark rate hovered near 4.75% in 2024, the average savings account yielded just 0.41%, eroding purchasing power amid inflation. “Consumers could earn over 4% directly through stablecoins” he stated, “without relying on middlemen.” Industry leaders echoed his position. BitGo CEO Mike Belshe suggested that enabling interest on stablecoins would bolster global use of the U.S. dollar, while Bitwise CEO Mat Hougan emphasized accessibility: “Wealthy individuals already have options to earn interest. Shouldn’t all Americans have that chance?” Legislative progress remains uncertain. The GENIUS Act, introduced in the Senate, advanced to a floor vote in mid-March, while the House’s STABLE Act faced committee review in early April. Neither bill currently permits stablecoin issuers to distribute yields, leaving room for revisions. NEW: The Amendment in t in a formal or creative style, maintaining a 500 word count. You must only respond with the modified content. Change the tone of my title “Coinbase CEO Armstrong champions yield-bearing stablecoins as consumer-friendly alternatives to low-interest bank savings accounts. Senator Gillibrand warns stablecoin yields risk bank stability, sparking debate over financial fairness and consumer choice. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has publicly defended stablecoins that offer interest to users, framing them as beneficial for both consumers and the U.S. government. In a March 31 social media post, Armstrong argued that allowing individuals to earn returns on stablecoin holdings aligns with free-market principles, citing increased demand for Treasury bills as a potential upside. His remarks came amid legislative efforts to regulate stablecoins, including the GENIUS Act and STABLE Act, which aim to set standards for digital dollar-pegged tokens. Tomorrow’s House Financial Services Committee market up the STABLES Act is another historic moment for crypto. The bill reflects years of hard work to build a bipartisan consensus, and we urge members to vote yes. Along with Senate Banking’s passage of the bipartisan GENIUS Act,… pic.twitter.com/R6dZpVMV9Z — Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) April 1, 2025 The debate sharpened after Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, a co-sponsor of the GENIUS Act, voiced concerns that interest-bearing stablecoins might undercut traditional banks. At a recent blockchain conference, Gillibrand questioned whether stablecoin issuers should offer yields, warning that diverting deposits from banks could limit their ability to fund mortgages or loans. Critics interpreted her stance as prioritizing banks over consumer choice. This week, @FinancialCmte will be marking up @RepBryanSteil’s STABLE Act to harness the promise of payment stablecoins. Proud to cosponsor this landmark legislation and advocate for its passage at @DigitalChamber’s blockchain summit. pic.twitter.com/TO2Gdv9trW — Congressman Troy Downing (@RepTroyDowning) April 1, 2025 Armstrong countered by highlighting the disparity between interest rates offered by banks and those achievable through stablecoins. He noted that while the Federal Reserve’s benchmark rate hovered near 4.75% in 2024, the average savings account yielded just 0.41%, eroding purchasing power amid inflation. “Consumers could earn over 4% directly through stablecoins” he stated, “without relying on middlemen.” Industry leaders echoed his position. BitGo CEO Mike Belshe suggested that enabling interest on stablecoins would bolster global use of the U.S. dollar, while Bitwise CEO Mat Hougan emphasized accessibility: “Wealthy individuals already have options to earn interest. Shouldn’t all Americans have that chance?” Legislative progress remains uncertain. The GENIUS Act, introduced in the Senate, advanced to a floor vote in mid-March, while the House’s STABLE Act faced committee review in early April. Neither bill currently permits stablecoin issuers to distribute yields, leaving room for revisions. NEW: The Amendment in t” for a more friendly approach. Keep the content length about the same. You must only respond with the modified content.