The governance system of Polkadot is moving toward a significant redesign of its staking framework through two new OpenGov referenda, #1909 and #1910. These proposals are aimed at refining the network’s security model while also cutting the overall cost of maintaining that security. At the same time, they attempt to improve participation incentives for validators and reduce risk exposure for nominators. If approved, the changes would mark one of the most notable shifts in Polkadot’s staking structure to date.
Strengthening Validator Incentives and Security Structure
Referendum #1909 focuses on reshaping validator behavior by reinforcing self-stake requirements and reward mechanics. It builds on an already approved rule requiring a 10,000 DOT minimum self-stake, and adds further incentives tied directly to validator contributions. Under the proposal, validator commissions would be set to 0%, effectively shifting reward dynamics toward self-staked capital rather than operational fees. It also introduces permissionless chilling for under-bonded validators, allowing the system to automatically respond to those not meeting staking expectations.
Related: Polkadot Launches AI-Powered MCP Server to Transform Developer Experience
The intent behind these changes is to strengthen long-term network security by ensuring validators have more skin in the game. By increasing reliance on self-stake and reducing passive income structures, the system encourages more committed participation. In theory, this reduces the likelihood of low-quality or under-incentivized validators remaining active in the set. The result is a leaner, more economically aligned validator ecosystem that prioritizes security efficiency over convenience.
Reducing Risk and Friction for Nominators
Referendum #1910 shifts attention to nominators, introducing changes that significantly reduce participation friction. One of the most impactful adjustments is the removal of nominator slashing, which previously exposed delegators to direct penalties. In addition, the unbonding period is reduced from roughly 28 days to just two days, dramatically improving liquidity and flexibility for participants. These changes are designed to make staking more accessible while encouraging broader participation in the network.
Together, the two referenda aim to rebalance responsibilities between validators and nominators. Validators are expected to take on more financial commitment and accountability, while nominators gain a simplified and less risky experience. The combined effect is a system that pushes security responsibility upward while easing entry and exit conditions for everyday participants. If successfully implemented, these updates could make Polkadot’s staking model both more efficient and more user-friendly, potentially setting a new standard for governance-driven blockchain economies.
